|
This article
examines the notification system and its exemptions
The starting point for
any discussion on the system of notification set up under the 1998 Act
must be that it is generally a criminal offence to process personal
data unless there is a relevant entry on the register of data
controllers. The register entry must reflect both the fact of
processing and also list the types of processing undertaken by the
registrant data controller (for definitions of 'processing', 'personal
data' and 'data controller' see the Ultimate Guide Part
I
The register is held
and maintained by the Office of the Information Commissioner (OIC),
located in Wilmslow, Cheshire, United Kingdom. The register is a public document and
can be inspected at the OIC's premises or online at www.dpr.gov.uk
A search of the register will reveal the name of the registrant,
registration number, date of expiry of current registration and the
types of processing registered as undertaken by that data controller.
This article considers
the notification process in detail, including whether any particular
data controller should notify its processing activities, the penalties
for failing to notify and the exemptions from the notification
requirement.
The Need to Notify
The obligation to
notify arises out of section 17 of the Data Protection 1998 which
provides that,
"…personal data
must not be processed unless an entry in respect of the data
controller is included in the register maintained by the Commissioner…"
The requirement to
have a register entry prior to carrying out personal data processing
first arose under the Data Protection Act 1984. The premise behind the
system is transparency, i.e. that individuals should be able to
inspect a publicly available register to determine who is processing
personal data and the reasons that they are doing so.
Certain types of
processing are exempt from the need to notify - see below. But it is
most important for data controllers to realise that the Data
Protection Principles (contained in Schedule 1 to the Act) apply to
all processing, even if such processing is exempt from the
notification requirement. This means that the OIC can take action
against data controllers for breaching one or more Principles as a
result of processing that was not required to be notified.
How to Notify
Notification can be
undertaken either online, www.dpr.gov.uk,
or by telephone +44 (0)1625- 545 700. In each case the data controller will be asked for certain
information - see below.
The data controller
will then be sent a copy of the draft register entry and given an
opportunity to amend it before it becomes available for public
inspection. Data controllers should ensure that all their automated
processing (unless exempt—see below) is covered in their register
entry.
Manual data processing
does not need to be notified, but data controllers may volunteer to
include their manual processing within their register entry. The
advantage of notifying manual data processing for data controllers who
only process that type of data is that the data controller will
thereby be subject to less onerous disclosure obligations where a data
subject access request is made (see section 24 of the Act).
The notification fee
is £35 and the register entry will be maintained for one year. About
two months before the expiry of the registration, the OIC will contact
the data controller to invite renewal - a further £35 fee is payable
each year. Only one register entry is permitted per data controller.
What to Notify
The data controller
will be asked for its name, address, contact information and company
registration number (if relevant). The data controller will then be
expected to make general statements about the types of processing
undertaken and whether or not personal data are sent outside the
European Economic Area - see below.
The general statement
includes information on the purposes of processing (e.g. for credit
referencing, fundraising, trading in personal information), the data
subjects whose data are being processed (e.g. staff, customers,
agents), the classes of data processed (e.g. personal details,
employment details, family and social circumstances) and the persons
to whom the data may be disclosed (e.g. prospective employers,
financial institutions, the media). In each case the data controller
is given an opportunity to select from a list of available options.
When data controllers
are considering whether they send personal data outside the EEA, they
should bear in mind the need that some businesses have to book foreign
hotel rooms or airline tickets for their employees. They should also
be aware that where personal data are available on the data controller's
website, such availability will effectively be a transfer to all
countries of the world. If data are to be sent outside the EEA then
the notification must reflect this fact.
Data controllers will
additionally be expected to make a security statement. This consists
of a series of questions to which the answer may be either 'yes'
or 'no'. It should be noted that there are no adverse consequences
of answering with a 'no'. However, where data controllers find
that their answers are in the negative, they should be aware that
their processing may breach the Seventh Data Protection Principle.
The
questions are set out in the insert on the next page.
It should be
remembered that if the data controller's processing changes after a
notification has been made, there is a duty to inform the OIC of this
change as soon as possible - data controllers should not wait until
the expiry of their 'notification year' before informing the
Commissioner of the change.
The Criminal Offences
Prosecutions by the
OIC for breaching the notification and related requirements of the Act
take place in local magistrates' courts - for this reason they tend
to escape public attention. Of the 145 cases prosecuted under the 1984
Act in the year 1999-2000, 130 resulted in a 'guilty' verdict. Examples of companies and firms who were prosecuted in the last year
include Butlins, Canon & Co Solicitors, Hitachi, Nottinghamshire
Probation Committee, the Rugby Football Union and Playmate Escort
Services Ltd.
The above prosecutions
took place under the 1984 Act regime. The new regime includes offences
that are defined in slightly broader terms. A future article in this
series will set out the offences in detail. As far as the notification
regime is concerned, it is generally a criminal offence to:
By virtue of s.61 of
the 1998 Act, a director, manager, secretary or other officer of a
corporate body may be prosecuted for the same offence as that which
has been proved against the corporate body if he or she has been
involved in the offence by way of some connivance or neglect.
The Exemptions
The rules on
exemptions from the notification requirement derive from the Data
Protection (Notification and Notification Fees) Regulations 2000.
Certain types of person are exempt from the notification requirement:
-
individuals who
process personal data for personal, family or household affairs
(including recreational purposes);
-
data controllers
who only process personal data for the maintenance of a public
register;
-
data controllers
who do not process personal data on computer; and
-
some not-for-profit
organisations.
The OIC
has given
guidance that the above reference to 'computer' includes desktop,
mainframe, laptop and palmtop or hand-held device. It also includes
other equipment that have some ability to process data automatically,
such as automated information retrieval systems for microfilm and
microfiche, audio and visual systems, electronic flexitime systems and
telephone logging equipment.
Additionally, certain
types of processing are exempt from the requirement to notify, namely
processing undertaken for:
It should be noted
that the exemption from the requirement to notify will be lost where
the processing is for one of the purposes listed in the table below.
Conclusion
Notification is
important, not least because it is a criminal offence to process
personal data without a corresponding register entry. The notification
process is relatively quick and cheap.
It must be remembered
however, that notification is not the complete picture. By making an
appropriate notification to the OIC, a data controller is merely
complying with one obligation in the Data Protection Act. Data
controllers must then go on to comply with the Data Protection
Principles—notification does not exempt data controllers from
compliance with other obligations in the Act.
Non-Exempt
Purposes
- Private
Investigation
- Health
Administration and Services
- Policing
- Crime Prevention
and Prosecution of Offenders
- Legal services
- Debt
Administration and Factoring
- Trading/Sharing in
Personal Information
- Constituency
casework
- Education
-
|